Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
claude-code-delegate-local

claude-code-delegate-local

by fegone
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

list_local_agents

Lists available local agents with their name, description, and model, enabling delegation to alternative backends.

Instructions

Lista los agentes disponibles en ~/.claude/agents/ que pueden delegarse con delegate_to_local_agent(). Devuelve nombre, descripción (del frontmatter) y modelo declarado de cada uno.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_local_agents"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.6.0

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It clearly states it is a listing operation with no side effects, and specifies return values. Sufficiently transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence conveying all necessary information without redundancy. Highly concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and a clear output schema (described), the description fully covers what the tool does and returns. Complete for its simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, so the description adds no value beyond schema. Baseline score of 4 is appropriate as schema coverage is 100% and no extra parameter info is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists available agents from a specific directory, mentions the sibling function for delegation, and specifies the returned fields (name, description, model). It is specific and distinguishes from siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when needing to know available local agents for delegation, but does not explicitly state when not to use or compare to alternatives. Sibling context helps, but explicit guidance is missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools