webdev-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to webdev-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides web development tools including taking screenshots of screens, enabling AI agents to capture and analyze visual content during development.232 npm11-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables capturing website screenshots with full-page, element-specific, and device-responsive capabilities through natural language commands.320 npm61MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to capture and analyze web page screenshots using Puppeteer, supporting multi-breakpoint captures, error reporting, and page interactions.135 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that provides AI coding agents with real-time visual access to web apps, enabling them to see screens, run accessibility and layout inspections, and interact with pages through a shared live panel.1,134 npm127MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI coding tools to control a browser for automated actions, UI extraction, network interception, and screenshots.231-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to capture and view screenshots, supporting multiple AI tools and platforms.14 npm21MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: listScreens enumerates available displays, while takeScreenshot captures a specific screen. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the task.
The naming is mixed: listScreens uses camelCase, while takeScreenshot uses camelCase but with a different verb style (list vs. take). Both are readable, but they lack a consistent pattern like verb_noun or uniform casing, which could cause minor confusion in a larger set.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a web development domain, which typically involves more operations like browser control, DOM manipulation, or network monitoring. This limited scope may restrict agent capabilities and suggests an incomplete tool surface.
For a webdev-mcp server, the tools only cover screen listing and screenshot capture, leaving significant gaps in web development workflows such as page navigation, element interaction, or performance testing. The surface is severely incomplete for the implied domain, likely causing agent failures in broader tasks.