eval-sample-size
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| eval_sample_sizeA | How many test cases are needed to trust that model A's accuracy really differs from model B's. |
| eval_min_detectable_gapC | Smallest accuracy improvement over baseline_acc that an eval with n test cases can reliably detect. Use this to sanity-check an existing eval set. |
| eval_compare_pairedA | Is A's win over B on a shared test set statistically real? |
| eval_compare_unpairedC | Is A's win over B real when each was scored on a different sample? Two-proportion z-test with a CI on the gap. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct statistical purpose: planning sample size, checking minimum detectable gap, paired comparison, and unpaired comparison. The paired vs. unpaired tests are explicitly distinguished by name and description, leaving little room for misselection.
All tools share the eval_ prefix and snake_case formatting, which provides a predictable namespace. However, the suffixes mix verb-led names (eval_compare_paired) with noun phrases (eval_sample_size, eval_min_detectable_gap), a minor inconsistency.
Four tools is well-scoped for a focused eval-statistics utility. Each tool covers a distinct and necessary part of sample-size planning and model comparison, with no redundant entries.
The surface covers the key lifecycle for eval statistical planning: determining required sample size, assessing detectable gaps, and comparing models under both paired and unpaired designs. No obvious gaps remain for the stated purpose.