eval-sample-size
Related Servers
Alternatives to eval-sample-size
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEval-integrity statistics for AI benchmark claims — multiple-testing correction, power/MDE for model gaps, judge-bias and leaderboard-rank checks. Catches a benchmark number that won't survive a second look.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server exposing statistical regression testing for LLM agents as a "run" tool: p-value, effect size, and confidence interval on whether agent behavior actually changed.162 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to score retrieval quality with recall, precision, nDCG, hit rate and MRR, compare 2-3 configurations with seeded paired-bootstrap confidence intervals, audit agent tool calls against expected traces, and detect prompt regressions against golden sets. It also generates Markdown, JSON or JUnit reports with pass/fail gates, all deterministically and offline without paid API keys.6308 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides a virtual statistician for AI agents, offering real statistical methods such as design of experiments, hypothesis testing, regression, and process control. It includes an advisor tool to recommend appropriate analyses and generates plain-language interpretations of results.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables statistical A/B testing by computing Welch's two-sample t-test, Satterthwaite degrees of freedom, and two-tailed p-values, alongside time-series forecasting, anomaly detection, regression, and PCA through MCP tools.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform statistical process control calculations using validated, deterministic tools such as control charts, capability analysis, and tolerance intervals.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct statistical purpose: planning sample size, checking minimum detectable gap, paired comparison, and unpaired comparison. The paired vs. unpaired tests are explicitly distinguished by name and description, leaving little room for misselection.
All tools share the eval_ prefix and snake_case formatting, which provides a predictable namespace. However, the suffixes mix verb-led names (eval_compare_paired) with noun phrases (eval_sample_size, eval_min_detectable_gap), a minor inconsistency.
Four tools is well-scoped for a focused eval-statistics utility. Each tool covers a distinct and necessary part of sample-size planning and model comparison, with no redundant entries.
The surface covers the key lifecycle for eval statistical planning: determining required sample size, assessing detectable gaps, and comparing models under both paired and unpaired designs. No obvious gaps remain for the stated purpose.