omada-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to omada-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables managing TP-Link Omada SDN controllers through MCP, exposing 72 tools for sites, devices, clients, networks, switch ports, firewalls, schedules, and site settings, including reboot and PoE scheduling.721MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-aware agents to query and manage a TP-Link Omada SDN controller by searching, inspecting, and calling operations from its live OpenAPI catalog.71MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for TP-Link Omada SDN controllers, enabling querying controller, site, device, and WiFi state.8Apache 2.0
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI assistants monitor and manage TP-Link Omada controllers. It provides analytics and read-only queries plus write operations such as rebooting devices, blocking clients, and changing network or firewall settings.84MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes the UniFi Network Integration API as MCP tools, dynamically loaded from JSON manifests, with read-only mode by default.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to inspect and manage TP-Link Omada controller networks through documented Open API operations, with safety profiles, read-only defaults, dry-run write previews, and read-back verification.113MIT
TDQS
Scored across 35 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct resources (devices, clients, WLANs, ACLs, VPN tunnels, WAN status, logs), and the get_* vs list_* vs diagnose_* split is meaningful. Overlap exists between list_clients and the list_wifi_clients/list_wired_clients subsets, and between network_audit/get_config_snapshot/diagnose_wan which all report WAN health from different angles, but descriptions make the intended use reasonably clear.
Almost all names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_*, get_*, diagnose_*, search_*, diff_*), with list_/get_ used predictably for collections vs single records. The one deviation is the noun-style 'network_audit', and 'explain_error'/'diff_config_snapshots' are slightly off-pattern but still readable.
35 tools is heavy and exceeds a comfortable range, though the breadth reflects a genuinely wide network-controller domain (sites, devices, clients, WiFi, ACLs, VPN, routing, DNS, RF, logs). Some tools are thin convenience wrappers (list_wifi_clients, list_wired_clients, get_rf_scan) that could be parameters of existing tools rather than separate entries.
The read-only observability surface is thorough: inventory, topology, health audits, config snapshots with diffing, diagnostics, and error decoding cover the monitoring lifecycle well. The main gap is that the server is entirely read-only—no mutations for DHCP reservations, ACLs, WLANs, or firmware upgrades—so flows like 'detected pending firmware' dead-end without an action tool.