Skip to main content
Glama
fakepixels

Base Network MCP Server

by fakepixels

Related Servers

Alternatives to Base Network MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI-driven on-chain interactions with the Zora Protocol on Base, supporting token queries, swaps, and transfers via natural language.
      17
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides onchain tools for Claude AI to interact with the Base blockchain and Coinbase API, enabling wallet operations, testnet ETH, balance checks, fund transfers, and smart contract deployment.
      6
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that bridges AI models with Ethereum blockchains via all JSON-RPC calls, enabling natural language queries for block numbers, balances, transactions, and smart contract data.
      20
      21
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects Claude for Desktop with blockchain functionality, allowing users to check balances and send tokens on EVM and Solana chains through natural language interactions.
      -

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Three tools have clearly distinct purposes (check_balance, create_wallet, list_wallets) with no overlap, but process_command is ambiguous as it could potentially duplicate or overlap with the functionality of the other tools through natural language interpretation, creating some confusion in tool selection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (check_balance, create_wallet, list_wallets), but process_command deviates slightly by using a more abstract verb and including 'command' instead of a specific noun, breaking the pattern and reducing overall consistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools, the count is reasonable and well-scoped for a wallet management server, though it feels slightly thin as it lacks tools for operations like updating or deleting wallets, which are common in such domains.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers basic wallet operations (create, list, check balance) and includes a general command processor, but there are notable gaps such as missing update_wallet, delete_wallet, or transaction-related tools, which are typical for network operations and could lead to agent workarounds or failures.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues