imovel_cadastrar_proprietario

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action but does not clarify if the tool is idempotent, whether it overwrites an existing owner, or what authentication is required. The mutation nature of the tool is implied but not detailed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no fluff. While it could be expanded with more detail, it is concise and front-loaded. However, it sacrifices completeness for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (2 required parameters, one nested object, no output schema), the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain the input format, expected return values, or any state dependencies. The agent cannot reliably invoke this tool without additional knowledge.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not explain what 'codigo' represents (property code or owner code?) nor the expected structure of the 'proprietario' object. The agent is left with no semantic context beyond the parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Vincula proprietário ao imóvel' which translates to 'Links owner to property'. The verb 'Vincula' is specific and distinguishes this tool from sibling tools like 'imovel_cadastrar' (create property) and 'imovel_alterar' (alter property).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisites (e.g., property and owner must exist), nor does it specify when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.