agendamentos_pesquisar
Retrieve and filter scheduled appointments from the CRM to find specific meetings and events.
Instructions
Lista agendamentos no CRM.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filtros | No |
Retrieve and filter scheduled appointments from the CRM to find specific meetings and events.
Lista agendamentos no CRM.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filtros | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only says 'Lists appointments' without mentioning any behavioral aspects like authentication, pagination, or performance impact.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence of 3 words, which is concise but severely lacking in informative content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has one parameter, no output schema, and many siblings, the description is incomplete—it does not explain the parameter usage or differentiate from related tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter 'filtros' has 0% schema description coverage and the main description adds no meaning beyond the schema, leaving the agent without any understanding of how to use filters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Lists appointments in the CRM' which gives a verb and resource, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like agendamentos_por_cliente or agendamentos_por_corretor.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; siblings have specific filters that could be used instead.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/fabiohsan-dev/mcp-vista-loft'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server