Skip to main content
Glama
fabianofilho

revisor-notas

by fabianofilho
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to revisor-notas

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Medical MCP Server

      unal1540
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query authoritative medical sources such as FDA, WHO, PubMed, RxNorm, and ClinicalTrials.gov from a local, key-free server. Provides drug searches, health statistics, graded medical literature, clinical guidelines, pediatric resources, and built-in health monitoring without sending data to the cloud.
      82 npm
      ISC

    • perimeter-mcp

      Cocongas
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding assistants to check code for common health-data mistakes locally without an account, and, with a configured core service, de-identify clinical text, restore placeholders, and append tamper-evident audit log entries.
      1
      7 npm
      MIT

    • FHIR MCP Server

      aranyajenkins7342
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLM-based agents and MCP-compatible clients to query and manipulate clinical data on a FHIR-compliant backend using natural-language prompts, with full CRUD operations, document ingestion, semantic search, and LOINC terminology support.
      -

    • Medical MCP Server

      AntonioMartin947
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query authoritative sources such as the FDA, WHO, PubMed, RxNorm, and ClinicalTrials.gov for drug information, health statistics, clinical guidelines, and literature with evidence grading. It runs locally with no API keys required, adding rate limiting, circuit breakers, caching, and health monitoring for reliable private access.
      82 npm
      ISC
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools are clearly related but serve distinct output purposes: one produces a validation report, the other an annotated version of the note. Descriptions explicitly differentiate them, though an agent might briefly hesitate about which to call for a given user request.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern in Portuguese, using snake_case: validar_nota_soap and sugerir_correcoes. The convention is consistent and the verbs accurately describe the actions.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only two tools, the server is on the smaller side, but they cover the two core operations for a note reviewer: validate and suggest corrections. The count feels reasonable rather than thin because each tool is substantial and has a clear purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The domain is clinical note review, and the pair covers validation (including semantic checks) and actionable inline suggestions. There are no obvious dead ends, though a tool for a structured list of errors separately from annotation is already covered by validar_nota_soap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources