Skip to main content
Glama
fabianofilho

radar-papers-mcp

by fabianofilho

Related Servers

Alternatives to radar-papers-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM-assisted biomedical literature screening and structured extraction from PubMed alerts, PMIDs, DOIs, and GEO accessions, with full-text retrieval and multi-provider LLM support.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local research workflows (paper discovery, relevance scoring, digests) and homelab monitoring (Prometheus, logs) through an MCP server, using local LLM inference via Ollama with no cloud dependencies.
      -
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to build and query a project-local literature database by ingesting papers from Semantic Scholar, PubMed, arXiv, and OpenAlex, caching open-access PDFs, extracting full text, ranking results, and exposing MCP tools for search, seeds, feedback, and pipeline status over stdio.
      16
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server pulling academic publications (arXiv, PubMed, HF Daily Papers), trending code (GitHub, HF Hub), and medical-device regulatory data (FDA 510(k), recalls) into newspaper-style briefings. Per-category round-robin, weighted configuration, sandbox-safe Python launcher.
      16
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves recent paper lists, the other generates a structured summary of a single paper. No overlap or ambiguity in their roles.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in Portuguese: buscar_papers_novos and resumir_paper. Naming style is uniform, lowercase with underscores.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only two tools, the set is minimal but fits a narrow, focused purpose (monitor new papers and summarize them). It stays on the thin side but does not feel inadequate for that bounded scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow of finding new papers and getting summaries is fully supported. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool to fetch a single paper's raw metadata by ID), but agents can complete the primary loop without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues