Skip to main content
Glama
fabianofilho

radar-papers-mcp

by fabianofilho

Related Servers

Alternatives to radar-papers-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM-assisted biomedical literature screening and structured extraction from PubMed alerts, PMIDs, DOIs, and GEO accessions, with full-text retrieval and multi-provider LLM support.
      74 PyPI
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local research workflows (paper discovery, relevance scoring, digests) and homelab monitoring (Prometheus, logs) through an MCP server, using local LLM inference via Ollama with no cloud dependencies.
      -
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to build and query a project-local literature database by ingesting papers from Semantic Scholar, PubMed, arXiv, and OpenAlex, caching open-access PDFs, extracting full text, ranking results, and exposing MCP tools for search, seeds, feedback, and pipeline status over stdio.
      16
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server pulling academic publications (arXiv, PubMed, HF Daily Papers), trending code (GitHub, HF Hub), and medical-device regulatory data (FDA 510(k), recalls) into newspaper-style briefings. Per-category round-robin, weighted configuration, sandbox-safe Python launcher.
      16
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one discovers new papers, the other summarizes a specific paper. There is no overlap or ambiguity about which tool to use.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern in Portuguese: buscar_papers_novos and resumir_paper. This is highly predictable and consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels minimal but not unreasonable for its narrow scope. It covers a simple search-and-summarize workflow, though it is borderline thin.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflows are covered: discovering papers and summarizing them. A minor gap is the lack of a way to list configured topics used by the search filter, but the server's stated purpose is otherwise satisfied.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues