Skip to main content
Glama
expertintegrado

Pipedrive MCP

by expertintegrado
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Pipedrive MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Pipedrive MCP Server

      osherai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs like Claude to interact with Pipedrive CRM data through a standardized interface, providing 22 tools for managing deals, persons, organizations, activities, and more.
      22
      1
      MIT

    • GHL MCP Server

      mnewby20305
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to manage GoHighLevel CRM contacts, pipelines, and workflows through natural language commands.
      33 npm
      MIT

    • pipedrive-mcp

      Dimkanarb-afk
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Full-featured Pipedrive MCP server for Claude Desktop, enabling natural language control over deals, leads, persons, organizations, notes, activities, pipelines, and more via 34 tools and 7 prompts.
      5 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., separate CRUD for deals, persons, activities). Some overlap exists between create_deal and create_deal_full, and between get_deal, get_deal_flow, get_deal_summary, but descriptions clearly differentiate their intended use cases.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., create_deal, list_activities, update_deal_fields). No mixing of styles or ambiguous verbs.

    Tool Count4/5

    26 tools is on the higher end but reasonable for a CRM server covering multiple entities and operations. The count seems scoped to the domain, though a few tools could potentially be merged.

    Completeness2/5

    Significant gaps: missing delete operations for all entities (deals, persons, organizations, activities, notes) and missing update_organization. This leaves agents unable to remove records, which is a critical workflow failure.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources