Get Sessions
get_sessionsList all currently active browser sessions to monitor and manage parallel automation tasks.
Instructions
List all active browser sessions.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
get_sessionsList all currently active browser sessions to monitor and manage parallel automation tasks.
List all active browser sessions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.14Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'List all active browser sessions,' which implies a read-only operation but does not explicitly state that it is non-destructive, nor does it mention any side effects or return format. The description is minimal and lacks disclosure beyond the verb itself.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no redundant words. It is appropriately concise and front-loaded, stating the action and scope immediately.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description covers the core purpose. It could optionally mention that it returns a list of session identifiers or clarify what qualifies as 'active,' but these are not critical for a simple listing tool. The description is sufficiently complete for an agent to use it correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has zero parameters, so the description adds no parameter-specific semantics, but none are needed. The baseline for 0 params is 4, and the description does not conflict or confuse.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a clear verb ('List') and a specific resource ('all active browser sessions'), which unambiguously identifies the tool's function. It distinguishes from sibling tools like start_session and close_session by focusing on the listing action.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage – an agent would use this to see which sessions are active – but it does not explicitly state when to use it over alternatives or any exclusions. Since the action is distinct from start/close, the usage is inferred rather than spelled out.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.