Skip to main content
Glama

Cloud Tool Manage Tool

tool_manage

Manage MCP tools in FleetQ server: list, create, update, delete, activate, deactivate, and test remote servers to control AI agent capabilities.

Instructions

Manage LLM tools (MCP servers, built-in). Actions: list, get (tool_id), create, update, delete, activate, deactivate, probe_remote (url — test remote MCP server). Note: discover_mcp and import_mcp are not available in cloud.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
actionYesAction to perform: list, get, create, update, delete, activate, deactivate, probe_remote
statusNoFilter by status: active, disabled
platform_onlyNoIf true, return only platform-level tools (shared across all teams)
limitNoMax results to return (default 10, max 100)
tool_idYesThe tool UUID
nameYesTool name
descriptionNoTool description
typeNoTool type: mcp_stdio, mcp_http, mcp_bridge, built_in (default: mcp_stdio)mcp_stdio
transport_configNoTransport configuration (command, args, env for stdio; url, headers for http)
risk_levelNoRisk classification: safe, read, write, destructive
credential_idNoUUID of a linked Credential to use for this tool (optional; preferred over inline api_key)
network_policyNoJSON string defining egress rules for Docker sandbox (built_in bash only). Example: {"rules":[{"protocol":"tcp","host":"api.example.com","port":443}],"default_action":"deny"}
clear_credential_idNoSet true to remove the linked credential from this tool
credential_overridesNoKey-value pairs of environment variable overrides (e.g. API keys). Values are stored encrypted.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Explains probe_remote behavior ('test remote MCP server') but fails to disclose destructive capabilities (delete), side effects of activation, or what create/update operations actually affect (e.g., restarting servers).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Excellent density. Two sentences covering scope, all 8 actions with parenthetical clarifications, and environment limitations. No redundancy or tautology despite poor title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a CRUD management tool but minimal given high complexity (14 params including nested transport configs, risk classifications, egress policies). With no output schema, some behavioral hints about return values or pagination would strengthen completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage establishing baseline 3. Description adds value by clarifying probe_remote's purpose and noting cloud limitations absent from schema. Transport_config and network_policy complexity hinted at but not elaborated upon.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb (manage) and resource (LLM tools/MCP servers/built-in) with comprehensive action enumeration. Distinguishes from sibling '*_manage' tools by specifying it handles tool definitions rather than agents, workflows, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Contains useful negative guidance about unavailable features ('discover_mcp and import_mcp are not available in cloud'), but lacks explicit guidance on selecting between actions or prerequisites (e.g., when tool_id is required vs optional despite schema marking it always required).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/escapeboy/agent-fleet-o'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server