Skip to main content
Glama
esaio

esa MCP Server

Official
by esaio

Update an existing comment

esa_update_comment
Destructive

Update an existing comment in an esa team by providing its comment ID and new Markdown content. Specify the team and optionally set the author.

Instructions

Updates an existing comment in an esa team by comment ID.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
userNoComment author's screen_name (owner permission required)
bodyMdYesThe updated comment content in Markdown format. Use 4 spaces for indentation.
teamNameNoTeam name (required). Use esa_get_teams first to see available teams.
commentIdYesThe comment ID to update
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide destructiveHint: true, so the description's 'updates' aligns. No additional behavioral details beyond what annotations cover.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no waste. Could add brief usage context but efficient for the minimal information needed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks return value description, error conditions, or how to obtain the comment ID. With no output schema and only sparse context, the description is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions. The tool description adds no extra meaning, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'updates', resource 'existing comment', and identifier 'by comment ID'. Distinguishes from sibling tools like esa_create_comment and esa_delete_comment.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of prerequisites (e.g., needing a valid comment ID) or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/esaio/esa-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server