Skip to main content
Glama
esaio

esa MCP Server

Official
by esaio

Search esa documentation and help

esa_search_help
Read-only

Search esa documentation for features, terminology, and specifications using specific query terms to get relevant results.

Instructions

Search esa documentation for features, terminology, and specifications. Use this when users mention esa-specific terms, ask about esa functionality, or request help with esa workflows that you're not familiar with.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number
queryYesSearch query string. Use specific terms, not wildcards like "*". Empty string returns all posts. ## Important Note for Date Queries: **WARNING: Do NOT use 'after:', 'before:', 'since:', or 'until:' syntax (these are from GitHub/Gmail/pplog). Use esa-specific date syntax: created:>YYYY-MM-DD, created:<YYYY-MM-DD, updated:>YYYY-MM-DD, updated:<YYYY-MM-DD ## Important Note for Relative Date Queries: **CRITICAL: Always get today's actual date from the system before processing relative date queries (e.g., "today", "yesterday", "last week", "recent"). When searching, apply these strategies: 1. Convert concepts to technical terms (e.g., general descriptions → specific property names, method names, or technical keywords) 2. Translate between Japanese and English technical terms (e.g., Japanese concepts → English API/property names) 3. Expand to related technical elements (e.g., one concept → multiple implementation approaches, related technologies, or alternative solutions) IMPORTANT: Space-separated terms are treated as AND conditions. Use "OR" operator for alternative terms: "word-break OR word-wrap OR overflow-wrap". Advanced search: "tag:release", "category:dev", "wip:false", "keyword:API", "title:設計書". Category search: "on:category" (posts directly in category), "in:category" (posts in category and subcategories), "on:/" (uncategorized posts). For broader results, use OR between related terms rather than listing them with spaces.
perPageNoItems per page
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description confirms this is a read-only search tool. The description adds context about searching documentation rather than posts, which is beyond what annotations alone provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with the first sentence front-loading the purpose. It is concise but the second sentence is somewhat lengthy; still, no superfluous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the annotations and schema, the description is complete enough for a search tool. It does not explain return format, but that is common knowledge for search results. The tool's simplicity does not require extensive additional context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions including warnings about date syntax. The tool description itself does not add additional parameter meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches 'esa documentation for features, terminology, and specifications', distinguishing it from sibling tools like esa_search_posts which searches actual posts. The verb 'search' and resource 'documentation' are specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells when to use this tool: when users mention esa-specific terms, ask about functionality, or need help with workflows. It does not explicitly state when not to use it, but the sibling list provides alternatives like esa_search_posts for general post searching.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/esaio/esa-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server