dbgprobe.disconnect
Close an active debug probe session and release allocated resources to cleanly end the connection.
Instructions
Close a debug probe session and release resources.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Close an active debug probe session and release allocated resources to cleanly end the connection.
Close a debug probe session and release resources.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description says 'release resources' but does not specify what resources are released (e.g., file handles, hardware connections) or whether the operation is safe to call multiple times. With no annotations, the description lacks sufficient behavioral detail.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise—one sentence with no filler. It is front-loaded with the core purpose, but could still add useful detail without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain the session_id parameter or any post-conditions, leaving the user without enough context to use the tool properly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The only parameter, session_id, is not explained in the description. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should provide context (e.g., where to obtain the session_id, expected format), but it does not.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Close a debug probe session') and the result ('release resources'), with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like dbgprobe.connect, which is the opposite action.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not mention that it should be called after finishing a session or before disconnecting, nor does it provide context about prerequisites or consequences.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/es617/dbgprobe-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server