A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to create interactive prototypes, annotate UI elements, generate PRDs, and track which annotations and documents need updating after changes.
22
2
MIT
VibeSharing MCP Server
by erova
Related Servers
Alternatives to VibeSharing MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to contribute to and query a team-shared project memory, storing human-confirmed decisions with source and scope so work can continue across machines.12Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to push HTML prototypes to DesignPin for team review and retrieve reviewer feedback.345 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants like Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex to share chat logs, terminal history, and session context with each other. Eliminates the need to re-explain context when switching between different AI coding tools.2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceGives AI coding assistants persistent memory, safety controls, and project awareness by tracking coding sessions, protecting critical files from modifications, and managing approval workflows with automatic changelog generation.1911 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceBridges disconnected AI sessions with persistent project memory and automatic session handoff, integrating GitHub workflows for context-aware development.185 npm20MIT
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 21 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., list vs. create vs. deploy vs. share), but the deploy/share family (deploy_prototype, deploy_files, share_html, import_repo) could be misselected without careful description reading. The descriptions are detailed enough to disambiguate, but the overlapping actions of deploying and registering create minor ambiguity.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., list_prototypes, create_collection, send_support_request). Even multi-word names like close_feedback_loop and generate_feedback_topics maintain the convention. No camelCase or mixed styles detected.
Tool Count3/5
With 21 tools, the server is at the 'heavy' end of the borderline range. While each tool appears to serve a distinct purpose, the count feels substantial for a typical MCP server, and an agent may need to scan many options before choosing.
Completeness3/5
The server covers a wide range of operations: authentication, deployment, sharing, feedback triage, context management, and diagnostics. However, there are notable gaps: no update or delete operations for prototypes or collections, and no get-by-ID function for prototypes. These limitations could force agents to work around them.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues