Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
monarch-mcp2

monarch-mcp2

by erikrubstein
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Receipts Get Receipt Settings

receipts_get_receipt_settings
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve receipt settings from Monarch Money, optionally selecting specific fields and choosing summary, full, or raw output.

Instructions

Get receipt settings.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "receipts_get_receipt_settings"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
fieldsNoOptional dotted output field paths to return, such as ['id', 'merchant.name', 'category.name'].
output_modeNoOutput shape to return. Use summary for compact CLI-style defaults, full for complete structured data without raw, and raw for complete structured data including raw payloads.summary
session_pathNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

C2.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds no behavioral context beyond what annotations provide. It does not mention side effects, authorization needs, or what the settings represent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but it is under-specification, not conciseness. With three parameters and no output schema, more detail is needed. The single sentence adds minimal value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and incomplete parameter documentation, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what receipt settings are or what the tool returns, leaving the agent with insufficient context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 67% (two of three parameters documented in schema). The description adds no parameter-specific information. For the undocumented session_path parameter, the description offers no help.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get receipt settings' has a verb and resource, but it is a tautology of the tool name and title. It does not explain what 'receipt settings' are or differentiate from siblings like receipts_update_receipt_settings or receipts_get_receipt.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools