upload_file
Upload a local file to an Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 filesystem at a specified destination path.
Instructions
Upload a file to ADLS2
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| upload_file | Yes | ||
| filesystem | Yes | ||
| destination | Yes |
Upload a local file to an Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 filesystem at a specified destination path.
Upload a file to ADLS2
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| upload_file | Yes | ||
| filesystem | Yes | ||
| destination | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden but only states the basic action. It does not disclose behavior like overwrite policy, authentication requirements, size limits, or error handling.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While the description is short, it is underspecified and fails to provide necessary details, making it more of a placeholder than a concise, informative statement.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema, annotations, and parameter explanations, the description is severely incomplete for a tool that interacts with an external storage system.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It does not elaborate on upload_file, filesystem, or destination, leaving their semantics ambiguous.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Upload) and the resource (a file to ADLS2), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like download_file or rename_file.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as create_directory or set_file_metadata, nor are there any conditions or exclusions mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/erikhoward/adls-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server