ADLS2 MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to ADLS2 MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 through the Model Context Protocol, supporting file and directory operations such as upload, download, rename, and metadata management.16MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables file system operations such as listing directories, reading, writing, creating, and deleting files or directories through MCP.12 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides MCP tools to interact with Databricks SQL warehouses, enabling metadata discovery, table reading, and DDL operations.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables SQL query execution and database structure browsing via MCP tools and resources.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables managing and interacting with any S3-compatible storage endpoint through MCP tools for listing, reading, writing, copying, and deleting buckets and objects.11MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables accessing and managing files from configured folders with filtering and size limits, allowing listing, reading, and searching files via MCP tools and resources.3-
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (filesystem vs directory vs file operations). However, 'get_file_metadata' and 'get_file_properties' could be confused, and 'set_file_metadata' vs 'set_file_metadata_json' have similar functionality.
The naming pattern is mostly verb_noun (e.g., create_directory, upload_file). However, 'directory_get_paths' breaks this pattern by starting with the noun, which is a minor inconsistency.
With 16 tools, the server is slightly above the typical well-scoped range (3-15), but still reasonable for an ADLS2 service covering filesystems, directories, and files.
Notable gaps exist: there is no delete_file operation for file cleanup, no copy operation, and no update for filesystems. Agents managing files will hit a dead end trying to delete a file.