Skip to main content
Glama
episodic-rush

Korean Law MCP

by episodic-rush
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Korean Law MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Korean Law MCP

      pragato-throwaway
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing comprehensive Korean legal data access (laws, precedents, regulations, ordinances) with citation verification, temporal comparison, impact graphs, and legal research workflows.
      10
      6,898 npm
      MIT

    • LexLink-ko-mcp

      joohyukjung
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Korean National Law Information. Enables searching and retrieving Korean laws, English-translated laws, administrative rules, court precedents, and constitutional decisions via 54 MCP tools.
      54
      -

    • Korea Housing MCP

      doorijaehyuk
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      This MCP server integrates South Korea's national law information, building registers from MOLIT, and KOSIS statistics for housing development research. It enables searching laws, retrieving building details, and accessing statistical data through natural language.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: search/get law texts, ordinance radar, annexes, research vs analysis, and decision search/retrieval. However, legal_research and legal_analysis both handle multi-step queries, and their sub-modes (e.g., full_research vs ordinance_compare) could cause overlap confusion, though descriptions help.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names are mostly descriptive with verb_noun pattern (search_law, get_law_text, get_annexes, search_decisions, get_decision_text), but names like ordinance_radar, legal_research, legal_analysis, and the meta tools (discover_tools, execute_tool) break the pattern. The mix of camelCase and snake_case (e.g., includeText, detailLimit) in parameters further reduces consistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    10 tools is a reasonable count for a domain as broad as Korean law. The surface covers core search, retrieval, and analysis needs. Slightly on the higher side but each tool serves a distinct purpose, well-scoped for the complexity of legal research.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the main legal workflows: searching laws, retrieving full text, checking annexes, analyzing ordinances against higher laws, and multi-domain decision search. Minor gaps include direct version comparison (e.g., diff between two law versions) and a dedicated tool for checking law validity date ranges, but the existing legal_analysis.applicable_law mode addresses some of this.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources