GCP MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to GCP MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects to Google Cloud services, allowing users to query logs, interact with Spanner databases, and analyze Cloud Monitoring metrics through natural language interaction.4078 npm80Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects to Google Cloud services, allowing users to query logs, interact with Spanner databases, and analyze monitoring metrics through natural language.78 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server for Google Cloud Platform, enabling interaction with Resource Manager, Compute Engine, Cloud Storage, BigQuery, Pub/Sub, and Cloud Logging via natural language.3-
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server allowing Claude AI to interact with AWS resources through natural language, enabling users to query and manage AWS services without using the traditional AWS Console or CLI.36-
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants like Claude to perform Google searches and retrieve web data directly through natural language requests.1250 npm169MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Kubernetes clusters through natural language, supporting core Kubernetes operations, monitoring, security, and diagnostics.39 npm960MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Tools are mostly distinct: billing-related tools (budget, info, forecast) are clearly separate, and list/select tools for different resources are unambiguous. The only potential confusion is 'run-gcp-code' which is vague but still distinct from other tools.
All tool names follow a consistent verb-noun pattern with hyphens (e.g., get-billing-budget, list-gke-clusters, select-project). The naming convention is uniform and predictable.
The server has 9 tools, which is an appropriate size for a focused GCP management server. It covers several key areas without being overwhelming.
The tool surface is limited to reading and listing operations for select GCP services (billing, logs, GKE, SQL, projects). Missing CRUD operations for resources, compute, storage, IAM, and other common GCP tasks. The vague 'run-gcp-code' tool does not compensate for these gaps.