HR Leave Management MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| check_leave_balanceC | Check an employee's remaining leave balance. |
| apply_leaveC | Submit a leave request. |
| approve_leaveC | Approve a leave request. |
| reject_leaveC | Reject a leave request. |
| list_leave_requestsC | List all leave requests. |
| employee_detailsC | Get employee details. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action (apply, approve, reject, list, check balance, employee details) with no overlap. An agent can easily distinguish their purposes.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., apply_leave, approve_leave). However, 'employee_details' deviates slightly as it is a noun phrase rather than verb_noun, causing minor inconsistency.
With 6 tools, the set is well-scoped for HR leave management. Each tool serves a necessary function, and the count is neither too few nor too many.
The core leave lifecycle is covered (apply, approve, reject, list, balance check). Missing features like cancel or update leave are minor gaps, but the surface is largely complete.