Skip to main content
Glama
empezarcero

pov

by empezarcero
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to pov

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • windows-computer-use-mcp

      Einosensokami
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local, dependency-free MCP server that gives AI agents controlled access to the active Windows desktop, enabling automated interaction with applications through screenshots, clicks, typing, and window management.
      76 npm
      MIT

    • omni-computer-use

      Jason26214
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Windows desktop automation via MCP, allowing AI agents to control mouse, keyboard, and screen capture with the same interface as Anthropic's computer-use tool.
      4
      MIT

    • Windows-MCP

      Books-QAQ
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to seamlessly integrate with the Windows operating system, performing tasks such as file navigation, application control, UI interaction, and QA testing via the MCP protocol.
      -

    • OpenEyes

      yangpeng366
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing AI-friendly computer-use primitives (capture, detect, click) to let LLM agents drive desktop GUI applications on Windows, macOS, and Linux.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (mouse vs keyboard vs window vs display), but move_window and resize_window overlap since move_window can also resize with -1 parameters, and focus_window vs set_window_state could potentially confuse. Descriptions are clear enough to disambiguate.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming follows mixed conventions: list_monitors, close_window, and focus_window use verb-first, while mouse_move, mouse_click, and keyboard_type are noun-first, and screenshot is a single word. The pattern is readable but not consistent across the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 16 tools, the set is on the heavier side of typical scopes, but it covers four distinct domains (display, input, window, process) with no redundant tools. Each tool earns its place, though it feels slightly larger than necessary.

    Completeness4/5

    Core desktop automation workflows are covered: capture screen, move/click/scroll, type, and manage windows. Missing capabilities like per-window screenshots and drag-and-drop are minor gaps that agents can often work around with existing tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources