Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ted-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve public procurement notices from 17 sources across Germany, the EU, and the UK, with filtering by country, CPV code, deadline, and contract value, plus full tender details and source freshness checks.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes French and EU public procurement data (BOAMP + TED) as MCP tools for AI agents, enabling search for tenders, awards, and winner intelligence via typed filters.
      4
      62 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables search and analysis of European public procurement tenders, including EU above-threshold (TED) and below-threshold from 11 national sources, with hybrid search and filtering.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides normalized search over public-sector tender notices from TED, covering Spain and the rest of the EU. Supports filtering by country, keyword, CPV prefix, and publication recency, returning tender details and related links.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching and analyzing Polish public procurement tenders from BZP and TED, including filtering, tender details and timelines, offers and contract values, buyer/contractor profiles, CPV code lookup, and regional statistics, with optional AI-summary endpoints.
      12
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to find, score, and monitor government contract opportunities across UK, EU, and US with AI-powered relevance scoring.
      2
      49 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four tools have mostly distinct purposes: simple search, raw expert search, count-only, and syntax validation. search_tenders and search_notices overlap in domain but are differentiated by simple vs. advanced query modes, so misselection is possible but unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: search_tenders, search_notices, count_tenders, check_query. The naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools are well-scoped for a search-focused API: two search modes, a count utility, and a query validator. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers discovery, advanced querying, counting, and query validation for EU tenders, which is strong for a read-only search domain. A minor gap is the absence of a direct notice-detail retrieval tool by ID, though returned URLs partially mitigate this.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues