suite_auto_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=false, so the safety envelope is covered. The description adds value by disclosing the concrete side effects (git pull or pip install --upgrade) and characterizing the operation as automatic and safe, but omits restart requirements, failure behavior, or prerequisites.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence that names the action, target, environment, and mechanism with no filler. Efficient, though the parenthetical mechanism could be moved or expanded without cost.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a no-arg tool with annotations covering the safety profile, the essentials are present, but it lacks context an agent would want: prerequisites (git/pip availability), what happens on failure, and whether a restart or re-verification follows. Notably, git pull reaches a remote while openWorldHint=false, leaving the operational scope slightly unclear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to compensate for; the baseline of 4 applies. No parameter semantics are needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ("Ejecuta la actualización automática") and resource (Open Legal Chile Suite) and even names the mechanism (git pull / pip install --upgrade), which lets an agent distinguish it from suite_verificar_actualizacion and suite_instalar. It stops short of explicitly naming those siblings, but the action is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this versus the clearly related siblings (suite_verificar_actualizacion, suite_instalar, suite_doctor). The "automatic" wording implies it should be run without manual steps, but no conditions, prerequisites, or exclusions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.