grado_obtener_flashcards

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations, so the description carries the full burden. It does not disclose whether results are cached, personalized, randomized, or limited in number, nor any auth or rate behavior. Only the content domain is conveyed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single efficient sentence that front-loads the verb and the resource. No wasted words, though extremely terse given the lack of other guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter fetch with full schema coverage and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It does not explain what a flashcard contains or count limits, but the schema covers parameters well enough to invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters, so baseline 3. The description adds semantic context by clarifying that 'definicion' relates to definiciones sacramentales and 'plazo' to plazos fatales, reinforcing the enum-like values beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (obtiene) and resource (fichas mnemotécnicas) plus scope (definiciones sacramentales, plazos fatales procesales). Clearly distinguishable from siblings like grado_generar_cedula, but it does not name those siblings explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies study/exam usage context but never states when to choose this over alternatives like grado_generar_cedula or grado_interrogar. No when-not or exclusions provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.