deckard_runtime_environment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The verb 'Read' implies a non-destructive, read-only operation, but no annotations exist. The description provides no further behavioral details such as authentication needs, error handling, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no waste. However, it lacks structure like bullet points or sections that could improve scanability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description fails to explain the purpose of the 4 parameters, any constraints, or the shape of the output. The tool cannot be used confidently without additional context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning no param descriptions in schema. The tool description does not mention any parameters (login, target, http_port, name_type), leaving the agent with no semantic information beyond parameter names and types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool reads Deckard runtime version and Steam/Mesa launch environment defaults, which distinguishes it from sibling tools like deckard_power_status. However, the phrase 'launch environment defaults' is slightly vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any mention of prerequisites or context. The single-sentence description only states the purpose.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.