get_driver_info
Retrieve real-time driver information and telemetry data from iRacing.
Instructions
get driver info
Returns: dict: driver info
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve real-time driver information and telemetry data from iRacing.
get driver info
Returns: dict: driver info
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, yet description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as whether it is safe, idempotent, or requires special permissions. Only implies a read operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely brief but not efficiently informative. Front-loaded with verb and return type but missing key context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema and many sibling info-retrieval tools, the description should clarify what 'driver info' entails (e.g., name, team, stats). It fails to do so, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Zero parameters, so schema coverage is 100% trivially. Baseline score of 4 is appropriate as description adds no necessary param info.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states verb ('get') and resource ('driver info') but lacks specifics on what driver info includes. It is not a tautology since it adds return type but remains vague. Distinguishes from siblings by name only.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like get_camera_info or get_radio_info. Agent receives no contextual hints.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ellettie/iracing-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server