Motion MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Motion MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural-language management of Motion tasks, projects, schedules, comments, custom fields, and more, bridging Motion's API to LLM clients via MCP.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage tasks, projects, workspaces, schedules, comments, custom fields, recurring tasks, and statuses in Motion through natural language conversations.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Motion API for task and project management, including listing, creating, updating, and deleting tasks, projects, comments, and workspaces.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Motion tasks, projects, workspaces, schedules, comments, custom fields, and recurring tasks through natural-language conversation via the Model Context Protocol.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to Motion for comprehensive task and project management, including creating/updating tasks, managing projects, handling workspaces, comments, and recurring tasks with smart rate limiting.2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language management of Motion tasks, projects, schedules, and more via the Model Context Protocol, integrating with LLMs like Claude and ChatGPT.10Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct Motion resource (tasks, workspaces, projects, users, comments, etc.), so an agent can generally tell them apart. There is minor overlap risk between motion_tasks and motion_recurring_tasks, and motion_search overlaps somewhat with task/project lookup, but the descriptions clarify the boundaries.
The naming pattern is largely consistent: motion_ followed by a plural resource noun (motion_tasks, motion_projects, motion_users). The main deviation is motion_search, which uses an action rather than a resource noun, but the overall convention remains predictable.
Ten tools is well-scoped for a Motion integration covering tasks, projects, workspaces, users, search, comments, custom fields, recurring tasks, schedules, and statuses. Each tool earns its place and the count aligns with the breadth of the Motion API being exposed.
The tool surface covers the core Motion lifecycle well: tasks, projects, workspaces, users, comments, custom fields, recurring tasks, schedules, and statuses. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated tool for labels/filters or detailed scheduling operations, but agents can accomplish the main workflows with the provided tools.