A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceEnables Claude to interact with Things 3 task management, allowing natural language task creation, project analysis, and GTD workflow automation.
24
44
MIT
Things MCP Server
by elizagarate
Related Servers
Alternatives to Things MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with Things 3 on macOS, allowing users to create, update, and manage to-dos and projects, list tasks, search items, and navigate through Things lists using natural language.209 npm17ISC
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with task management data in the Things app, including creating tasks, managing projects, searching, and organizing priorities.211MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Things app through Claude Desktop, allowing task creation, project analysis, and priority management using natural language commands.22598MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLets you use Claude Desktop to interact with your task management data in Things app, enabling you to create tasks, analyze projects, manage priorities, and implement productivity workflows through natural language.36MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects Claude to Things 3 on macOS, allowing to add to-dos and projects, search, open lists, and read Today/Upcoming/Inbox via natural language.2 npmMIT
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 22 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clear distinct purposes, but the three search tools (search_items, search_todos, search_advanced) have overlapping functionality and could confuse an agent about which to use. The remaining tools are well-separated.
Naming Consistency5/5
Tools consistently use get_ for retrieval, add_ for creation, update_ for updates, and search_ for searching, all in snake_case. No mixing of conventions.
Tool Count4/5
22 tools is on the higher side but justified by the need to cover multiple views (today, upcoming, inbox, etc.) and CRUD for projects/todos. It's slightly heavy but still reasonable for a task management server.
Completeness3/5
CRUD for projects and todos is mostly covered, but missing explicit delete (only trash and cancellation) and no create/update for areas or tags. This leaves some gaps that agents may need to work around.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues