Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Edgegap MCP Server

Edgegap MCP Server

Official
by edgegap
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Create an Edgegap application

edgegap_create_app

Create a new application to hold game server versions. Only call this after edgegap_list_apps confirms no suitable application exists. Creating an application does not deploy anything — follow with edgegap_create_app_version.

Instructions

Create a new application to hold game server versions. Only call this after edgegap_list_apps confirms no suitable application exists. Creating an application does not deploy anything — follow with edgegap_create_app_version.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "name": "<name>"
    },
    "name": "edgegap_create_app"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesApplication name, 3-64 chars. Usually the game or project name.
dry_runNoShow the exact request (method, host, path, body) with secrets masked, and send nothing. Local checks still run. Use it to confirm a billable or destructive call before making it.
is_activeNoWhether deployments are allowed. Default true.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.5.2
    • addedInput schema / properties / dry_run
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Show the exact request (method, host, path, body) with secrets masked, and send nothing. Local checks still run. Use it to confirm a billable or destructive call before making it.",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
  2. First observedv0.1.2

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare openWorldHint, non-idempotent, non-destructive, but say nothing about side effects. The description adds real behavioral value by clarifying that creation 'does not deploy anything' and must be followed by edgegap_create_app_version, preventing a common misunderstanding. It does not cover auth requirements or what happens to the name if it already exists, so it stops short of 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences: the action first, the precondition second, the follow-up step third. No repetition of schema or title content and nothing extraneous.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, an agent still learns the logical next call, which partially compensates. The remaining gap is that the description never indicates what is returned (e.g. whether an application ID comes back for use in edgegap_create_app_version), though the chained-tool guidance makes the call sequence unambiguous.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter descriptions (name constraints, dry_run semantics, is_active default) are already richer than anything the description offers. The description adds no parameter-level meaning, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('Create a new application') and immediately clarifies what an application is ('to hold game server versions'), distinguishing it from version-creation and deployment siblings. An agent can identify it without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit precondition ('Only call this after edgegap_list_apps confirms no suitable application exists') naming the alternative tool and the condition that selects it, plus the required follow-up step (edgegap_create_app_version). Both when-to-use and what-comes-next are covered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools