update_sport_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It implies a partial update via optional parameters but does not explicitly state that only provided fields are updated, what happens if sport_id is nonexistent, or any permission/error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is reasonably concise and well-structured, but includes an Args block that duplicates the schema's parameter documentation, making it slightly redundant. Still, it is efficient and easy to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity and lack of annotations, the description omits important context: partial vs. full update semantics, error cases, and when to use this over sibling sport-settings tools. The return value is only vaguely described as 'Updated sport settings'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides thorough descriptions for all five parameters, including units and examples. The description's Args section merely repeats this information, adding no additional semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Update' with the specific resource 'sport-specific settings' and lists the key fields (FTP, FTHR, pace thresholds). This distinguishes it from sibling update tools for activities, events, and gear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like apply_sport_settings, create_sport_settings, or get_sport_settings. It does not mention prerequisites, scenarios, or when a different tool would be more appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.