Skip to main content
Glama
echelongraph

EchelonGraph MCP Server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to EchelonGraph MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to look up data breaches and leaked passwords, search NVD CVEs and the CISA KEV catalogue, and generate passive attack-surface reports for a domain covering security headers, TLS, email/DNS security, and CT-log subdomains. All checks are read-only and passive, using only public third-party data sources.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying live CISA KEV, EPSS, and enriched vulnerability feeds with full provenance. Enables natural-language access to auditable security-intelligence data from Claude Desktop and other MCP clients.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides CVE lookup, search, and exploit intelligence from public vulnerability sources (NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS) for AI agents to produce remediation guidance without consuming LLM tokens for data fetching.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying the CVE-Search API to browse vendors and their products, retrieve vulnerabilities per vendor/product, look up specific CVE IDs, fetch the latest 30 CVEs with CAPEC, CWE and CPE expansions, and check database metadata. This gives MCP clients conversational access to public vulnerability data.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying official CVE List V5 records enriched with CISA KEV data, including single or batch CVE lookups and required-action guidance for known exploited vulnerabilities.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct axes: single-CVE record (get_cve), CVE search (search_cves), per-CVE enrichment (cve_intel), remediation (cve_remediation), EPSS history, and exposure. However, check_affected/scan_manifest/check_sbom share the same underlying 'check component vs advisory corpus' purpose and differ mainly by input shape, and vendor_advisories_for_cve vs get_vendor_advisory vs search_vendor_advisories have fuzzy boundaries. An agent can usually pick correctly, but a few choices require careful reading.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    There is a recognizable scheme: get_* for single records (get_cve, get_cwe, get_vendor_advisory), search_* for lists (search_cves, search_vendor_advisories), check_*/scan_* for assessment, and resource-prefixed analytics (cve_*, kev_*, epss_*). The noun-only names like cve_exposure, exposure_radar, kev_recent and epss_history deviate from a strict verb_noun pattern, but the set remains predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Sixteen tools is at the heavier end for a single server, but this is a broad vulnerability-intelligence platform spanning CVE lookup, KEV, EPSS, exposure, SBOM/manifest scanning, CWE and vendor advisories, and each tool covers a distinct capability. Nothing is clearly redundant enough to remove, so the count is justified though slightly on the high side.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the read lifecycle well: search and fetch CVEs, summaries, KEV and EPSS feeds, per-CVE intel/remediation, exposure radar, CWE grouping, vendor advisory search/detail, and component assessment via single version, lockfile or SBOM. Minor gaps remain, such as a direct 'list all CVEs affecting a package/ecosystem' query, but the core workflows have no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive