Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
EchelonGraph MCP Server

EchelonGraph MCP Server

Official
by echelongraph
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to EchelonGraph MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • CVE-Search MCP Server

      Camille54359
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying the CVE-Search API to browse vendors, list products for a vendor, retrieve vulnerabilities for a vendor and product, fetch individual CVE records, get the latest CVEs with CAPEC/CWE/CPE expansions, and inspect current database version information. This gives MCP clients direct, structured access to public vulnerability data.
      -

    • CVE-Search MCP Server

      Chavez36040
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying the CVE-Search API to retrieve vendors, products, product-specific vulnerabilities, specific CVE IDs, recently updated CVEs with CAPEC/CWE/CPE expansions, and database update information. It supports natural-language access to CVE data through MCP clients.
      -

    • cvescout

      zember
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP client (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, or a custom agent) to fetch the latest CVEs at query time from live sources — NVD, CVE List V5, GitHub Advisory Database, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSS — without a separate API key. Exposes search, filtering (severity, RCE, PoC, KEV, keyword, CPE), per-CVE detail and risk-scored patch prioritization as JSON tools, so answers are grounded in live data rather than model memory.
      6
      1
      MIT
    • Breach Radar

      Breach Radarofficial

      MAASAI-Labs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to look up data breaches and leaked passwords, search NVD CVEs and the CISA KEV catalogue, and generate passive attack-surface reports for a domain covering security headers, TLS, email/DNS security, and CT-log subdomains. All checks are read-only and passive, using only public third-party data sources.
      10
      MIT

    • purify-feeds-mcp

      eason4kim-rocket
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying live CISA KEV, EPSS, and enriched vulnerability feeds with full provenance. Enables natural-language access to auditable security-intelligence data from Claude Desktop and other MCP clients.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear, distinct scopes: aggregate CVE summary, CVE search, single-CVE lookup, enrichment, remediation, vendor advisories, exposure, and three different component-checking inputs. Some overlap remains around CVE fix/remediation data across get_cve, cve_intel, and cve_remediation, which may cause occasional hesitation.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case and are readable, but the set mixes noun-first names such as cve_summary, exposure_radar, and epss_history with verb-first names such as get_cve, search_cves, check_affected, and scan_manifest. There is no single predictable verb_noun convention throughout.

    Tool Count4/5

    Sixteen tools are reasonable for a broad vulnerability-intelligence platform covering CVE data, KEV/EPSS, vendor advisories, exposure, and component scanning. The count is slightly above the ideal compact range but each tool appears to serve a real purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface is broad and covers CVE search/details, summary counts, enrichment, remediation, KEV, EPSS history, vendor advisories, exposure, and SBOM/manifest/component checks. Minor gaps exist around explicit batch CVE lookup or CWE search/list, but most workflows have a viable path.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUsually handled

    Resources