EchelonGraph MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to EchelonGraph MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides keyless, read-only access to CISA KEV, SSVC, and full ICS advisory corpus, letting users check CVE statuses, compute BOD 26-04 remediation timelines, and search advisories by vendor, product, CVE, CVSS, or sector.291 npm1Apache 2.0

Breach Radarofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to look up data breaches and leaked passwords, search NVD CVEs and the CISA KEV catalogue, and generate passive attack-surface reports for a domain covering security headers, TLS, email/DNS security, and CT-log subdomains. All checks are read-only and passive, using only public third-party data sources.10MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for querying live CISA KEV, EPSS, and enriched vulnerability feeds with full provenance. Enables natural-language access to auditable security-intelligence data from Claude Desktop and other MCP clients.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides CVE lookup, search, and exploit intelligence from public vulnerability sources (NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS) for AI agents to produce remediation guidance without consuming LLM tokens for data fetching.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables querying the CVE-Search API to browse vendors and their products, retrieve vulnerabilities per vendor/product, look up specific CVE IDs, fetch the latest 30 CVEs with CAPEC, CWE and CPE expansions, and check database metadata. This gives MCP clients conversational access to public vulnerability data.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying official CVE List V5 records enriched with CISA KEV data, including single or batch CVE lookups and required-action guidance for known exploited vulnerabilities.-
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools target distinct axes: single-CVE record (get_cve), CVE search (search_cves), per-CVE enrichment (cve_intel), remediation (cve_remediation), EPSS history, and exposure. However, check_affected/scan_manifest/check_sbom share the same underlying 'check component vs advisory corpus' purpose and differ mainly by input shape, and vendor_advisories_for_cve vs get_vendor_advisory vs search_vendor_advisories have fuzzy boundaries. An agent can usually pick correctly, but a few choices require careful reading.
There is a recognizable scheme: get_* for single records (get_cve, get_cwe, get_vendor_advisory), search_* for lists (search_cves, search_vendor_advisories), check_*/scan_* for assessment, and resource-prefixed analytics (cve_*, kev_*, epss_*). The noun-only names like cve_exposure, exposure_radar, kev_recent and epss_history deviate from a strict verb_noun pattern, but the set remains predictable and readable.
Sixteen tools is at the heavier end for a single server, but this is a broad vulnerability-intelligence platform spanning CVE lookup, KEV, EPSS, exposure, SBOM/manifest scanning, CWE and vendor advisories, and each tool covers a distinct capability. Nothing is clearly redundant enough to remove, so the count is justified though slightly on the high side.
The surface covers the read lifecycle well: search and fetch CVEs, summaries, KEV and EPSS feeds, per-CVE intel/remediation, exposure radar, CWE grouping, vendor advisory search/detail, and component assessment via single version, lockfile or SBOM. Minor gaps remain, such as a direct 'list all CVEs affecting a package/ecosystem' query, but the core workflows have no dead ends.