Skip to main content
Glama

note_list

Lists notes for a specific item as compact rows so AI agents can review sprint feedback without opening each note.

Instructions

List notes for an item as compact rows.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "note_list"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
agent_tokenNo
client_agent_idNo
claim_generationNo
client_session_idNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv0.2.2
    • addedInput schema / properties / agent_token
      Added value: +{
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / claim_generation
      Added value: +{
      +  "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / client_agent_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "maxLength": 200,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / client_session_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "maxLength": 200,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Addedv0.1.17
  3. Removedv0.1.15
  4. First observedv0.1.9

TDQS

C2.7/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden. 'As compact rows' hints that results are truncated summaries rather than full note bodies, which is genuinely useful, but nothing is said about ordering, pagination, limits, permissions, or whether note content is included.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with the resource and return shape front-loaded and no wasted words. It is arguably too terse rather than too long, but structurally sound.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and four of five parameters undocumented, the description is well short of what an agent needs to call this correctly — it does not explain the auth/session parameters or the result shape beyond 'compact rows'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% across 5 parameters. The description only implies the meaning of 'id' via 'for an item'; agent_token, client_agent_id, claim_generation, and client_session_id are completely unexplained in both schema and description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('List') and resource ('notes for an item'), which is enough to distinguish it from note_add, note_get, and note_update among siblings. It lacks explicit naming of those siblings, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this versus note_get (single note) or search, and no prerequisites or exclusions. The only implied guidance is that an item id is needed, which comes from the phrase 'for an item'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.