Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Japan Law Search MCP

Japan Law Search MCP

by easakura
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Japan Law Search MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • law-graph

      NexA-LLC
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and resolve Japanese legal provisions, inspect related laws and concepts, and traverse source-grounded relationships with explicit coverage and read-only access.
      MIT

    • jp-law-mcp

      yabooung
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to look up Japanese statutes and articles as of a chosen date, compare old and new versions, full-text search law bodies, and search National Diet session records. It also verifies whether legal citations in a document actually exist and traces which provisions cite or are cited by a given article.
      9
      41 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-japan-law

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying Japanese national laws and ordinances via the e-Gov Law API, allowing AI agents to access legal data through natural language questions.
      623 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: search_laws for finding laws, get_law_structure for browsing structural headings, and get_law_article for retrieving specific article text. There is no functional overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (search_laws, get_law_structure, get_law_article), making them predictable and easy to remember.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is minimal but sufficient for a focused law search server. The core workflow (search, browse structure, retrieve article) is covered, though additional tools like listing all laws or checking amendments could be justified.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the essential lifecycle: searching for laws, exploring their structure, and retrieving specific articles. While no major gaps exist, a tool to get law metadata or list recent updates would improve completeness.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources