Skip to main content
Glama
duytnb79
by duytnb79

Create task

create_task

Create a new Asana task with optional details like assignee, due date, projects, and custom fields. Use it to add tasks to your Asana workspace programmatically.

Instructions

Create an Asana task. This operation writes to Asana.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesTask name.
tagsNo
likedNo
notesNoPlain-text task description.
due_atNo
due_onNo
parentNoParent task GID when creating a subtask.
assigneeNoUser GID, email, 'me', or null to leave unassigned.
projectsNoProject GIDs to add the new task to.
start_atNo
start_onNo
completedNo
followersNo
workspaceNoWorkspace GID. Required unless projects or parent identifies the workspace.
opt_fieldsNoAdditional fields to return for the created task.
custom_fieldsNo
approval_statusNo
resource_subtypeNo
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only notes 'This operation writes to Asana,' which is already implied by 'Create,' and omits details about permissions, rate limits, or response behavior. Significant gaps remain.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very brief and front-loaded with the core purpose. However, the second sentence 'This operation writes to Asana' is redundant and does not add value, slightly reducing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's 18 parameters, nested objects, no annotations, and no output schema, this description is severely under-specified. It fails to mention required parameters, return structure, or behavioral nuances, making it inadequate for reliable tool invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 39%, leaving many parameters like tags, liked, followers, and custom_fields undocumented. The tool description adds no parameter explanations, failing to compensate for the low coverage and leaving the agent without sufficient guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Create an Asana task,' which clearly specifies the verb and resource. This distinguishes it from siblings like list_tasks, update_task, and get_task. The purpose is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as update_task or search_tasks. It does not mention prerequisites or typical use cases, leaving the agent without context for tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/duytnb79/asana-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server