A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceA local MCP server for Asana that uses a personal access token to read and manage Asana projects, tasks, sections, and comments via the standard Asana REST API.
8
19 npm
MIT
@duytnb79/asana-mcp
by duytnb79
Related Servers
Alternatives to @duytnb79/asana-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for Asana that accesses every workspace using a personal access token, enabling task and project management through integrated tools like list, create, and complete tasks.-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA local-first Asana MCP server that provides controlled writes, schema operations, diagnostics, and one-call briefs over the REST API using a Personal Access Token.7534 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP (Multi-Agent Conversation Protocol) server that enables interacting with the Asana API through natural language commands for task management, project organization, and team collaboration.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that connects AI assistants to the Asana API for task, project, and workspace management.33MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the Asana API that allows AI agents to read and optionally write to Asana tasks, comments, and custom fields, with tiered access controls and no delete tools.834 npmMIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools target distinct resources (sections, comments, projects) or distinct actions (list vs. get vs. create vs. update vs. search). The main potential confusion is between list_tasks and search_tasks, but their descriptions clarify the scope (project-scoped vs. workspace-wide search).
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: list_sections, add_comment, list_tasks, get_task, create_task, update_task, search_tasks. The sole exception is 'add_comment' rather than 'create_comment', but it still adheres to the same grammatical style.
Tool Count5/5
Eight tools is well-scoped for an Asana integration, covering the essential operations on tasks, projects, sections, and comments without redundancy. This is within the typical 3-15 range and each tool earns its place.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers the core task lifecycle (create, get, update, list, search) plus project listing, section listing, and comment creation. Missing operations like task deletion or project creation are notable gaps, but agents can work around them for most workflows.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues