get_album

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description declares 'Read-only' as a behavioral trait, which is clear. No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It adequately discloses it returns JSON with metadata and asset IDs, but does not mention potential side effects or permissions, which is acceptable for a simple getter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured: front-loaded with purpose, then usage guidance, then parameter details. Every sentence is informative with no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and existence of an output schema, the description is complete. It covers the purpose, usage context, parameter source, and return value overview. No gaps remain for typical usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, but the description adds meaning: 'album_id: The album's UUID (from list_albums or create_album).' This fully explains the parameter's nature and origin, adding significant value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get full details for a specific album including all its asset IDs.' It uses a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling by mentioning 'For listing all albums, use list_albums instead.'

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit context: 'Use this to inspect album contents or retrieve asset IDs for further operations.' Also gives when-not-to-use and alternative tool, and indicates where the album_id comes from (list_albums or create_album).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.