create_album

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as whether album names must be unique, whether the operation is reversible, or any permissions needed. The description only says 'Create a new album' without side effects or constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of a one-line purpose and a clear list of arguments. Every sentence adds value, and the structure is front-loaded with the key action first.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity and presence of an output schema, the description covers the basic functionality. However, it lacks context on common edge cases (e.g., duplicate names) and prerequisites, which an agent might need to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds value beyond the schema by providing example values (e.g., 'Roma, Italia' for name) and clarifying that asset_ids is an optional list to add immediately. Since schema coverage is 0%, this compensation is significant, though it could be more detailed (e.g., constraints on name format).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new album.' which is a specific verb+resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like add_assets_to_album (which adds to an existing album) and update_album (which modifies an existing album).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not mention that it should be used only when creating a new album, not when adding assets to an existing album, which is handled by a sibling tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.