Skip to main content
Glama

verification_bundle_artifact

verification_bundle_artifact
Read-onlyIdempotent

Compose a verification plan with project-intelligence signals and optional tenant audit into a stable typed bundle for safe completion and verification.

Instructions

Artifact tool for safe completion and verification: compose verification plan, project-intelligence signals, and optional tenant audit into one typed verification bundle. Basis is stable by default; artifactId shifts across calls only when includeSessionHandoff or includeIssuesNext is set, because those inputs are session-scoped. Dedupe is safe when both flags are off.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectIdNo
projectRefNo
queryKindYes
queryTextYes
queryArgsNo
includeTenantAuditNo
freshenTenantAuditNo
includeSessionHandoffNo
includeIssuesNextNo
sessionLimitNo
issuesLimitNo
traceIdNo
exportNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
toolNameYes
projectIdYes
resultYes
exportedNo
_hintsYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds significant behavioral info beyond annotations: basis stability, artifactId shifting conditions, dedupe safety. No contradiction with readOnly/idempotent hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences, front-loaded with purpose, each sentence adding unique value. No redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return values need not be detailed. However, with 13 parameters and no schema descriptions, the description omits essential param semantics, leaving a major gap for tool usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage and 13 parameters, description mentions only two flags (includeSessionHandoff, includeIssuesNext) but fails to explain crucial parameters like queryKind, queryText, projectId, etc.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool composes a verification bundle, specifying verb 'compose' and resource 'verification bundle'. It differentiates from siblings by emphasizing artifact nature and safety.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides specific guidance on when artifactId shifts (includeSessionHandoff, includeIssuesNext) and dedupe safety (both flags off). However, lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternative tool mentions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/drhalto/agentmako'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server