Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Datadog MCP Server

Datadog MCP Server

by dreamiurg
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

list_spans_metrics

List all configured span-based metrics used to create APM custom metrics from trace spans.

Instructions

List all span-based metrics (APM custom metrics) configured for generating metrics from APM spans.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_spans_metrics"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.11.0

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states it lists metrics, but omits details like pagination, read-only nature, or permissions. Minimal transparency beyond the action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no wasted words. Clearly communicates purpose and scope.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is minimal but adequate for a simple list operation. However, it lacks details about return format or potential filters, leaving some uncertainty for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist; schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no param-specific info but correctly indicates 'all' metrics, which is sufficient for a parameterless tool. Baseline score 4 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists 'span-based metrics (APM custom metrics) configured for generating metrics from APM spans.' The verb 'List' and resource are specific, and the phrase differentiates it from siblings like 'get-metrics' or 'list_logs_metrics'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get-spans-metrics' or 'list_logs_metrics'. Usage is implied (when needing all span-based metric configurations) but no exclusions or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools