Skip to main content
Glama
dreamiurg

Datadog MCP Server

by dreamiurg

Related Servers

Alternatives to Datadog MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides comprehensive read/write access to Datadog APIs, enabling management of monitors, dashboards, logs, incidents, and more via natural language commands.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that exposes tools to query Datadog monitors and logs, and AWS CloudWatch Logs, and to group recurring errors by fingerprint. Designed for use with Claude Code to diagnose issues and propose fixes.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive Datadog monitoring capabilities, enabling Claude to manage CI/CD pipelines, analyze logs, query metrics, and handle monitors and SLOs.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Datadog's monitoring and observability platform through the MCP protocol. Supports incident management, monitor status checks, log searches, metrics queries, APM traces, dashboard access, RUM analytics, host management, and downtime scheduling.
      13
      26 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that enables AI assistants to search, aggregate, and explore OpenSearch log data through 12 tools for connectivity, index discovery, search, and aggregations.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that enables users to query Databricks SQL, browse metadata, and monitor Delta Lake tables. It also supports tracking Databricks Jobs, DLT Pipelines, and cluster metrics through natural language interfaces.
      25
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 117 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    The tool set contains multiple apparent duplicates, such as get-logs-indexes/get-log-indexes, list_security_rules/list_security_monitoring_rules, and get-downtimes/list_downtime_schedules. The parallel use of dash and underscore names for similar resources (get-containers vs list_containers) further blurs distinctions.

    Naming Consistency1/5

    Naming is chaotically mixed: some tools use kebab-case (search-spans, get-containers) while others use snake_case (list_containers, search_incidents), and verbs vary between get/list/search/aggregate without a consistent pattern for resource vs collection operations.

    Tool Count1/5

    117 tools is an extreme count that creates overwhelming selection overhead for an agent. Even for a broad platform like Datadog, the surface is far too large to navigate efficiently, and many tools overlap or duplicate others.

    Completeness2/5

    The set covers a wide range of read operations across many Datadog domains but is heavily biased toward querying and listing. Core management actions like create/update/delete for monitors, dashboards, SLOs, and incidents are missing, leaving significant workflow gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues