Skip to main content
Glama
dozzman
by dozzman

Related Servers

Alternatives to SonarCloud MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A server that provides tools for retrieving SonarQube project metrics and quality data through a simplified message-based approach, allowing users to programmatically access metrics, historical data, and component-level information from SonarQube.
      14
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight TypeScript MCP server that provides AI assistants with seamless access to SonarCloud data, enabling code quality metrics, issues, and project queries.
      12
      91 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A server for analyzing technical debt across multiple programming languages, integrating with MCP-compatible tools to detect code quality issues and provide prioritized recommendations.
      16
      112 npm
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for SonarQube that enables LLM agents to discover projects, analyze code quality metrics, check Quality Gate status, search issues with filters, and rank projects by worst-performing metrics. It provides read-only, safe access to SonarQube instances with structured outputs and error handling.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one fetches issues, the other provides a summary. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent 'verb_noun' naming pattern (fetch_sonarcloud_issues, summarize_sonarcloud_issues), making the naming predictable and clear.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin. While it may serve a narrow purpose, the tool count is at the borderline of being insufficient for a typical server scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover fetching and summarizing issues for a PR, but are missing operations like retrieving details for a single issue or listing all issues for a project. The surface is notably incomplete for broader SonarCloud operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues