agenda_excluir_agendamento

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The word 'definitivamente' (permanently) indicates irreversibility, adding useful behavior. With no annotations, the description partially compensates but still omits details like required permissions or status constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence effectively conveys the tool's action with no wasted words. Front-loaded and concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete tool, the description is adequate but lacks differentiation from the cancel sibling. No output schema or success/failure details are provided, which is acceptable given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Parameter 'agendamentoId' is fully described in the schema (100% coverage). The description restates the parameter's purpose without adding new semantic value, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states permanent deletion of an appointment, using a specific verb and resource. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool 'agenda_desmarcar_agendamento' (likely cancel), which would be helpful.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'agenda_desmarcar_agendamento'. The description lacks context for choosing between deletion and cancellation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.