Skip to main content
Glama
dotojr123

ProDoctor MCP Server

by dotojr123

Related Servers

Alternatives to ProDoctor MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes the Feegow clinic management API as MCP tools for agents, enabling scheduling, patient management, and more via natural language.
      97
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes tools from the Ecuro Light API for managing clinical appointments, patient records, and clinic availability. It enables users to perform healthcare management tasks such as scheduling, patient search, and report generation through MCP-compatible clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes the BrasilAPI as MCP tools, enabling AI agents to query Brazilian public data such as CEP, CNPJ, DDD, IBGE, banks, PIX, FIPE, NCM, exchange rates, taxes, weather, CVM information, holidays, ISBN, domains, stock tickers, and TUSS.
      41
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for real-time querying of the Bradesco Saude referenced network, exposing a search_providers tool to search for doctors, hospitals, clinics, and labs.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action on specific entities (agenda, paciente, procedimento, tabela, usuario). Even within the appointment group, verbs like alterar, buscar, desmarcar, detalhar, excluir, horarios_livres, inserir, listar are clearly separated. No two tools have overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with an entity prefix followed by a verb or verb_noun (e.g., agenda_inserir_agendamento, paciente_detalhar). No mixing of conventions or cases.

    Tool Count5/5

    18 tools cover the main operations of a medical scheduling system: appointments (10), patients (3), procedures (3), procedure tables (1), and users (2). The count is well-scoped for the domain without being excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness3/5

    Appointment lifecycle is fully covered (CRUD, status changes, free slots). However, patient management lacks creation and update tools (only list, search, detail). Procedure and user tools also miss creation/update/deletion. These gaps hinder complete workflow automation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues