MCP Memory Service
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Memory Service
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides Claude AI with persistent, searchable memory management across sessions using SQL database, semantic analysis with multi-provider LLM support (Anthropic/Ollama), vector search via ChromaDB, and graph-based knowledge relationships through Neo4j integration.1-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceSupercharges Claude Desktop with persistent semantic memory, sandboxed file I/O, live web search, and local emotional intelligence using a local ChromaDB and Hugging Face model.6-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides local-first, cross-session memory for Claude Code, enabling semantic search across past sessions to retrieve procedures, decisions, or answers without exposing secrets.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides Claude with long-term memory by indexing conversation history, enabling semantic search, decision tracking, and cross-project search.1829MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides persistent, searchable memory for Claude Code using local SQLite, semantic embeddings, and full-text search, enabling Claude to recall and retrieve context across sessions and projects without external services.64MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides persistent memory for AI assistants like Claude, storing and retrieving information across conversations using a local SQLite database.-
This server cannot be deployed
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: retrieve_memory finds memories based on content queries, search_by_tag filters by tags, and store_memory creates new entries. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these three operations.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (retrieve_memory, search_by_tag, store_memory) with snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and uniform across the set.
With only 3 tools, the set feels minimal but functional for a memory service. It covers basic operations (store, retrieve, search), but lacks advanced features like updating or deleting memories, which might be expected in a more comprehensive service.
The tools provide core CRUD-like operations for storing and retrieving memories, but there are notable gaps: no update_memory or delete_memory tools, which limits lifecycle management. Agents can work around this for basic use but may encounter dead ends for modifications.