close_session
Closes a terminal session by its serial port session ID, terminating the connection to the specified UART device.
Instructions
关闭指定的终端会话
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes | 会话ID(即串口路径),如 /dev/ttyUSB0 或 COM1 |
Closes a terminal session by its serial port session ID, terminating the connection to the specified UART device.
关闭指定的终端会话
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes | 会话ID(即串口路径),如 /dev/ttyUSB0 或 COM1 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided. The description only states the action 'close' without detailing side effects, resource release, or error conditions. The agent is left uninformed about the tool's behavior beyond the basic action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and direct.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (one required parameter, no output schema), the description is marginally complete but lacks details on expected outcomes or prerequisites for closing a session.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has 100% description coverage for the only parameter 'session_id'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description '关闭指定的终端会话' clearly states the tool closes a specific terminal session. It is a specific verb+resource combination, but does not differentiate from sibling tool 'close_port' which may have similar functionality.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'close_port' or 'close_session'. The description lacks context for appropriate usage scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/donnel666/uart-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server