fin-law-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to fin-law-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceKorean tax law for AI agents: search NTS rulings, court and Tax Tribunal decisions; read point-in-time statutes with the Act → Decree → Rule chain and amendment history; basic rules and execution standards; 96 tax treaties with withholding rates; forms and schedules; and verify citations in drafts. Fact-pattern comparison is done by your AI (or optional on-prem/cloud Upstage Solar).14245MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to compute Korean corporate tax, income tax, VAT, withholding, deemed interest, penalties, and limitation periods using verified year-by-year rate tables, with every result citing its governing statute. Runs entirely locally with no API key, and returns an error rather than estimating for years lacking a verified table.93487 PyPI87MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceIntegrates Korean startup laws (19 curated laws) and K-Startup support programs, enabling legal article search, citation verification, reference tracking, and program lookup with real-time status.1-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables deterministic research of Korean tax-law issues by retrieving and scoring official statutory evidence from law.go.kr and other legal sources, with citation verification and provenance, without deciding legal conclusions.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to retrieve current Korean tax statutes, judicial precedents, and tax authority interpretations via MCP, with daily-updated legislative history and full-text search.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and terminals to retrieve and cross-reference Korean legal sources through 10 tools built on 42 Ministry of Government Legislation APIs, covering statutes, precedents, administrative rules, ordinances, treaties, and interpretations. Adds hallucination-resistant citation verification, article impact graphs, point-in-time diffing of in-force versions, case citator checks, and applicable-law-at-the-time analysis.108,867 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct resource or action: statute search, single-article retrieval, ruling search, annex retrieval, citation verification, statutory calculation, and server diagnostics. Overlap is minimal, and descriptions explicitly assign priority use cases to further prevent misselection.
All tools use lowercase snake_case with a consistent 'fin_' domain prefix, and no mixed camelCase or chaotic verb styles appear. Although the names mix nouns and verbs, the overall pattern is predictable and easy to scan.
Seven tools is well-scoped for a specialized Korean tax-law research server. Each tool covers a distinct research or verification stage, and there is no obvious redundancy or bloat.
The core research lifecycle is mostly covered: statute search, article retrieval, ruling search, annex lookup, citation verification, and calculations. However, fin_ruling_search instructs users to use a non-existent 'fin_nts_ruling' tool to retrieve ruling bodies, and no tool appears to fetch full ruling or court decision texts, creating a notable dead end for deeper research.