Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to fin-law-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Integrates Korean startup laws (19 curated laws) and K-Startup support programs, enabling legal article search, citation verification, reference tracking, and program lookup with real-time status.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic research of Korean tax-law issues by retrieving and scoring official statutory evidence from law.go.kr and other legal sources, with citation verification and provenance, without deciding legal conclusions.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to retrieve current Korean tax statutes, judicial precedents, and tax authority interpretations via MCP, with daily-updated legislative history and full-text search.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and terminals to retrieve and cross-reference Korean legal sources through 10 tools built on 42 Ministry of Government Legislation APIs, covering statutes, precedents, administrative rules, ordinances, treaties, and interpretations. Adds hallucination-resistant citation verification, article impact graphs, point-in-time diffing of in-force versions, case citator checks, and applicable-law-at-the-time analysis.
      10
      6,898 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and analyze Korean law, including statutes, precedents, and ordinances, with citation verification and impact analysis.
      10
      6,898 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and retrieve Korean laws, regulations, administrative rules, legal interpretations, and precedents via official APIs for legal review workflows.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct resource or action: statute search, single-article retrieval, ruling search, annex retrieval, citation verification, statutory calculation, and server diagnostics. Overlap is minimal, and descriptions explicitly assign priority use cases to further prevent misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use lowercase snake_case with a consistent 'fin_' domain prefix, and no mixed camelCase or chaotic verb styles appear. Although the names mix nouns and verbs, the overall pattern is predictable and easy to scan.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a specialized Korean tax-law research server. Each tool covers a distinct research or verification stage, and there is no obvious redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    The core research lifecycle is mostly covered: statute search, article retrieval, ruling search, annex lookup, citation verification, and calculations. However, fin_ruling_search instructs users to use a non-existent 'fin_nts_ruling' tool to retrieve ruling bodies, and no tool appears to fetch full ruling or court decision texts, creating a notable dead end for deeper research.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues