tugra
Related Servers
Alternatives to tugra
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to persist and retrieve structured memory across sessions and models via MCP tools for cataloging, searching, and saving facts, with automatic supersession and scope filtering.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents and MCP clients to store, retrieve, and manage bi-temporal, graph-aware facts in an embedded SQLite memory engine with token-budgeted recall and contradiction tracking.61MIT

artificial-memoryofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to persist, recall, expand, trace, and inspect durable memories with provenance through MCP tools.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to store and recall an append-only, hash-chained memory with citation-backed semantic search, fact verification, contradiction detection, and replay/audit capabilities through local MCP tools.1AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to share a portable, user-level memory layer through MCP, allowing them to store, search, update, link, and consolidate facts with optional full-text and vector retrieval.79 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to persistently store and semantically search shared knowledge via MCP tools.2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: searching facts, reading by UID, proposing a draft fact, and appending telemetry. There is no meaningful overlap between fact_search, fact_read, fact_propose, and event_report.
All tool names use lowercase snake_case and an object-first pattern (fact_search, fact_read, fact_propose, event_report). Although event_report lacks the fact_ prefix, it follows the same noun-verb shape, making the naming predictable and consistent.
Four tools is a well-scoped surface for a fact-store server: two retrieval paths, one proposal/write path, and one telemetry path. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or bloat.
The search/read/propose set covers the main fact consumption and contribution workflows. Direct lifecycle operations such as update, retire, or approve are absent, but the proposal mechanism and archive flag suggest a curated interface where this is an acceptable minor gap.